Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268463›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025

Assessment of UK healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes and practice towards antibiotics, antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance: comparing findings from 2019 and 2024 national surveys.

Ellie L Tang, Libby Eastwood, Jane Bujakowski, Michael Dickinson, Donna M Lecky, Diane Ashiru-Oredope, UK Healthcare Professionals Survey Project Advisory Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ellie L TangAMR and HCAI Division, UK Health Security Agency, London NW9 5EQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4266-4844
Libby EastwoodBehaviour Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London NW9 5EQ, UK.
Jane BujakowskiBasis Market Research, London W1T 1UH, UK.
Michael DickinsonBasis Market Research, London W1T 1UH, UK.
Donna M LeckyAMR and HCAI Division, UK Health Security Agency, London NW9 5EQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1223-9356
Diane Ashiru-OredopeAMR and HCAI Division, UK Health Security Agency, London NW9 5EQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9579-2028
UK Healthcare Professionals Survey Project Advisory Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A national survey assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antibiotic prescribing was conducted in 2024 to determine changes from a 2019 survey and support commitments included in the UK 2024-29 National Action Plan for AMR. Methods: A previously EU-wide validated online survey tool was used to survey HCPs across 30 EU/EEA countries, including the UK, between 28 January and 4 March 2019, and repeated between 1 and 18 March 2024. Patient-facing HCPs from the four UK nations participated. Results: A total of 2996 HCPs from the four UK nations completed the 2024 survey. Most respondents were nursing professionals (31%, 943/2996), medical doctors (28%, 831/2996) or pharmacists (25%, 762/2996). Almost all HCPs correctly answered that antibiotics are ineffective against viruses and colds/flu (98%). Nearly a quarter of HCPs (24%, 723/2996) were unaware that resistant bacteria can spread from person to person. Over half of HCPs (62%, 1876/2996) answered all seven knowledge questions correctly: an increase of 2.6% from 2019 possibly driven by a 14.2% increase in allied healthcare professionals' knowledge. Knowledge in 2024 varied significantly between professions ( Conclusion: Knowledge levels varied significantly between HCPs, demonstrating the need for more targeted training with a focus on highlighting the important role HCPs play in tackling AMR, as well as awareness raising regarding available resources.

Identifiers

PMID41268463
PMCPMC12629081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.