ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Combination of remazolam and alfentanil on hemodynamics, postoperative cognitive function, and adverse cardiovascular events in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of remimazolam on postoperative neurocognitive disorder in elderly surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative effects of alfentanil-remimazolam versus fentanyl-remimazolam on anesthesia onset, emergence, and safety in first-trimester surgical abortion under intravenous anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of a remazolam-alfentanil combination versus a propofol-alfentanil combination on intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative cognitive function, and cardiovascular adverse events in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled 116 elderly patients (aged 60-80 years, ASA I-III) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 2022 to June 2023. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either remazolam-alfentanil (n = 58) or propofol-alfentanil (n = 58). Primary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic parameters (MAP, HR, CO, CI, SVR), cognitive function (MMSE and MoCA scores, and incidence of postoperative delirium [POD]), and incidence of cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes included recovery times and postoperative VAS and Ramsay scores. Results: A total of 112 patients (56 per group) completed the study. The remazolam group had significantly shorter times to awakening (10.41 ± 2.09 vs. 12.68 ± 2.73 min), extubation (11.17 ± 2.11 vs. 14.34 ± 2.62 min), and anesthesia duration (22.53 ± 6.66 vs. 28.81 ± 7.05 min) (all P < 0.001). Intraoperatively, the remazolam group showed more stable hemodynamics with higher MAP, HR, CO, and CI (P < 0.05). Postoperative MMSE and MoCA scores were significantly higher on days 3 and 7 (P < 0.05). The incidence of POD at day 7 was significantly lower in the remazolam group (3.6% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.031). The incidence of cardiovascular events was lower in the remazolam group (21.4% vs. 71.4%, P < 0.001), particularly hypotension (7.1% vs. 62.5%) and bradycardia (14.3% vs. 53.6%). VAS and Ramsay scores were also lower at 6 and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The remazolam-alfentanil combination provided faster recovery, improved hemodynamic stability, better cognitive outcomes, and fewer cardiovascular events than propofol-alfentanil in elderly laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. While promising, these findings warrant confirmation in larger, multicenter trials. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=210389, Identifier ChiCTR2300077536.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.