Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268423›Full record

Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Use of Intrathecal Amphotericin for Coccidioidal Meningitis.

Rebecca Y Linfield, Eva Gorenburg, Jane W Liang, Guillermo Rodriguez Nava, Vanessa El Kamari, Julie Parsonnet

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Drug Interactions for Inhibition or Killing ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca Y LinfieldDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-700X
Eva GorenburgProgram in Human Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8056-9207
Jane W LiangDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2302-3809
Guillermo Rodriguez NavaDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-7050
Vanessa El KamariDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-5424
Julie ParsonnetDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7342-5366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cases of coccidioidomycosis are increasing dramatically in the United States. The utility of intrathecal (IT) amphotericin in treating coccidioidal meningitis (CM) in the era of azole therapy is unknown. We sought to understand how IT therapy is associated with mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with laboratory-proven CM seen at Stanford Healthcare by an infectious diseases physician from 2008 to 2023. Results: Fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. All patients received azole therapy. Twenty-seven of those patients (47.4%) additionally received IT amphotericin. Patients receiving IT therapy had a higher median initial cerebrospinal fluid white blood cell count at diagnosis (462.5 vs 188 cells/μL, Conclusions: Patients who received IT amphotericin had higher mortality rates than those who did not, likely reflecting disease refractory to treatment. More therapies are needed for those who have disease progression on azole therapy.

Indexed as

antifungal agentscoccidioidal meningitiscohort studymortalityproportional hazards models

Identifiers

PMID41268423
PMCPMC12628506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.