ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The positive effect of perceived social support and moral resilience between moral injury and health-related productivity loss among emergency nurses.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building Resilience in Emergency Care Teams: A Narrative Review of Team-Based and Organisational Strategies for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Risk Stratification of Presenteeism in Clinical Nurses: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergency nurses frequently experience moral injury (MI) arising from high-risk ethical conflicts, heavy workloads, and exposure to traumatic events, which can contribute to health-related productivity loss (HRPL). However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Crucially, perceived social support and moral resilience may mediate this relationship by mitigating negative effects. Clarifying the mediating roles of perceived social support and moral resilience is essential to evaluate their influence on the relationship between MI and productivity loss, and to establish a model that explains this mechanism, thereby contributing to protecting nurses' well-being and safeguarding patient care quality. Objective: This study aims to explore the relationship between MI and HRPL, and to examine the mediating roles of social support and moral resilience. These insights are of great significance for enhancing the physical and mental well-being of emergency nurses and improving the overall quality of medical care. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted among 483 emergency nurses from five tertiary hospitals across three provinces in mainland China between January and May 2025. The survey instruments included the General demographic questionnaire, Moral Injury Symptoms Scale-Health Professionals Version (MISS-HP), Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS), Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) and Stanford presenteeism scale-6 (SPS-6). Descriptive analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were performed using SPSS 29.0. The structural equation model was constructed with AMOS 29.0 software, and Bootstrap testing was conducted. Results: The results showed that moral injury directly affected Health-related productivity loss ( Conclusion: Perceived social support and moral resilience jointly buffer the impact of MI on nurses' health-related productivity. Interventions should therefore strengthen both support and resilience. For example, hospitals could implement peer-support groups or resilience workshops, and nurses could practice mindfulness or seek mentorship to bolster coping skills. These strategies may mitigate the negative effects of moral injury and improve productivity. However, as a cross-sectional survey relying on self-reported measures, this study may be subject to response bias, highlighting the need for future longitudinal research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.