ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
From recognition to expression: extending cardiovascular emotional dampening to facial expressions under elevated blood pressure.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular Emotional Dampening (CED) refers to blunted emotional responsiveness in individuals with elevated blood pressure (BP), but research has exclusively focused on how such individuals perceive others' emotions. Given evidence that the ability to produce facial expressions of emotions is closely tied to emotion recognition via shared neural mechanisms, examining expressive deficits in CED could reveal additional pathways linking elevated BP with emotional communication. This study examined whether individuals with higher systolic and diastolic BP exhibit reduced accuracy and intensity when generating prototypical facial expressions of emotion. Methods: Participants (N = 74) across normotensive (n=33), prehypertensive (n=21), and hypertensive (n=20) categories were instructed to pose six basic emotions. Facial Action Units (AUs) were coded using certified human coders and OpenFace, allowing comparison of AU intensities, human-machine agreement, and expression accuracy. Prototypical emotion templates were used to determine accuracy, and interrater agreement was quantified via five complementary indices. Results: Emotional expression accuracy was significantly lower in prehypertensive and hypertensive groups, particularly for sadness, fear, and surprise. Correlational analyses revealed significant negative associations of SBP and DBP with accuracy of expressing sadness, disgust, and anger. Notably, expressions of happiness were preserved. Although overall agreement between human and machine ratings was high, reduced intensity and increased AU sparsity at higher BP levels likely suppressed reliability metrics. Discussion: These findings extend the CED framework from recognition to expression, revealing that elevated BP may blunt the expressive channel for particularly negative emotions, irrespective of arousal level. Though facial expression of emotions is limited to negative emotions, it is generalized across different levels of arousal within this category - from low (sad), moderate (disgust), to high (anger).The pattern suggests central autonomic influences on facial expressivity of emotions and opens new directions for identifying emotional communication deficits in at risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.