Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268372›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Caregivers' experiences of providing care to female patients in Swedish forensic psychiatric care.

Jessica Revelj, Ulrica Hörberg, Märta Wallinius, Mikael Rask

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica ReveljDepartment of Health and Caring Science, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Ulrica HörbergDepartment of Health and Caring Science, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Märta WalliniusDepartment of Research, Regional Forensic Psychiatric Clinic, Region Kronoberg, Växjö, Sweden.
Mikael RaskDepartment of Health and Caring Science, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A core element of caring science, is for caregivers to understand and collaborate with patients. Previous research shows that women receiving forensic psychiatric care evoke strong emotions among caregivers, but there is little research on the subject, and increased knowledge about caregivers' experiences of providing care for female patients in forensic psychiatry, and of balancing healthcare with public safety considerations, is needed for the continued development of evidence-based care. Method: This qualitative study aimed to describe and gain a greater understanding of caregivers' experiences of providing care for female patients in forensic psychiatric care. The study is based on 14 interviews with caregivers working with female patients at four forensic psychiatric clinics. The data were analyzed using a phenomenological hermeneutical method, which is suitable for researching lived experiences. The analysis was conducted in accordance with the method described by Lindseth and Norberg and revealed that caregivers emphasized the importance of being present in relation to the women. Results: The following themes emerged:

Indexed as

care environmentcare relationshipcoercive measuresfemale patientforensic psychiatryphenomenological hermeneutical methodwomen

Identifiers

PMID41268372
PMCPMC12626913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.