ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2025
A Brain-Computer Interface for Improving Auditory Attention in Multi-Talker Environments.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time brain-controlled selective hearing enhances speech perception in multi-talker environments.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- From Selective Listening to Brain-Controlled Hearing: A Perspective on the Future of Auditory Technology.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Review
- [Research on auditory neurofeedback technology and its multi-disciplinary applications].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Review
- Neurofeedback in Football: A Systematic Review of Cognitive, Technical, Physical and Psychological Outcomes.NeuroSci · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is significant research in accurately determining the focus of a listener's attention in a multi-talker environment using auditory attention decoding (AAD) algorithms. These algorithms rely on neural signals to identify the intended speaker, assuming that these signals consistently reflect the listener's focus. However, some listeners struggle with this competing talkers task, leading to suboptimal tracking of the desired speaker due to potential interference from distractors. The goal of this study was to enhance a listener's attention to the target speaker in real time and investigate the underlying neural bases of this improvement. This paper describes a closed-loop neurofeedback system that decodes the auditory attention of the listener in real time, utilizing data from a non-invasive, wet electroencephalography (EEG) brain-computer interface (BCI). Fluctuations in the listener's real-time attention decoding accuracy were used to provide acoustic feedback. As accuracy improved, the ignored talker in the two-talker listening scenario was attenuated; making the desired talker easier to attend to due to the improved attended talker signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A one-hour session was divided into a 10-minute decoder training phase, with the rest of the session allocated to observing changes in neural decoding. In this study, we found evidence of suppression of (i.e., reduction in) net neural tracking and decoding of the unattended talker when comparing the first and second half of the neurofeedback session (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.