ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Ultrasound-based DenseNet201 outperforms breast imaging reporting and data system and ResNet50 in predicting HER2 status in invasive breast cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the performance of ultrasound-based neural networks in predicting HER2 status in invasive breast cancer (IBC) patients, comparing DenseNet201, ResNet50, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model.
methodsBetween March 1 and December 30, 2019, 268 female patients with IBC underwent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. A total of 1127 ultrasonic images were collected, divided into a training set (70%) and an internal validation set (30%). The HER2 status was predicted using BI-RADS, MLP, ResNet50, and DenseNet201 models. The diagnostic performance of these models was evaluated using accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsBI-RADS demonstrated the weakest prognostic capability, with an AUC of 0.526, sensitivity of 74.7%, and specificity of 67.4%. The MLP model showed moderate performance with an AUC of 0.637 and accuracy of 75.1%. Among CNN models, DenseNet201 outperformed ResNet50, achieving an AUC of 0.660 and an accuracy of 73%, compared to ResNet50's AUC of 0.537 and accuracy of 67%. For distinguishing HER2-low and HER2-zero expression levels, the MLP model exhibited the highest AUC of 0.790, followed by DenseNet201 at 0.783. In external validation, DenseNet201 demonstrated a robust AUC of 0.860 (95% CI: 0.674-1.000; P < 0.05).
conclusionsUltrasound-based DenseNet201 outperformed BI-RADS and ResNet50 for predicting HER2 status in IBC, offering a promising, non-invasive diagnostic tool for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.