ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Comparison of combined intravenous-inhalation anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia in perioperative stress and outcomes of elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the effects of combined intravenous-inhalation anesthesia (CIVIA) and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy, and to evaluate their impact on perioperative stress response and postoperative outcomes.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 208 elderly patients who had undergone hepatectomy. The patients were divided into the CIVIA group (n=106) and the TIVA group (n=102) according to their anesthesia protocol. The CIVIA group received sevoflurane inhalation combined with propofol intravenous-inhalation anesthesia, while the TIVA group received only propofol and remifentanil intravenous infusion anesthesia. Baseline clinical indicators were compared between the groups. Stress response markers, hemodynamic parameters, and inflammatory indices were assessed at four timepoints: before anesthesia induction, immediately after surgery, and 12 h and 24 h postoperatively. In addition, the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) score, Aldrete score, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, perioperative pain score, Ramsay score, and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.
resultsIntraoperative blood loss (OR=0.868, 95% CI=0.818-0.921), anesthesia maintenance time (OR=0.695, 95% CI=0.592-815), and intraoperative complications (OR=0.0.159, 95% CI=0.030-0.853) were significantly associated with anesthesia techniques (all P < 0.05). The CIVIA group showed significantly shorter postoperative recovery, time to regain consciousness, and extubation time compared with the TIVA group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the CIVIA group exhibited more favorable results in stress response, hemodynamic stability, inflammatory indices, OAA/S score, Aldrete score, MMSE score, perioperative pain score, and postoperative complication rates at the immediate, 12 h, and 24 h postoperative assessments.
conclusionCIVIA shows significant clinical advantages in elderly patients with liver disease undergoing hepatectomy. This regimen provides effective anesthetic depth, maintains intraoperative hemodynamic stability, attenuates perioperative stress response, and reduces the risk of postoperative complications, making it a preferred anesthesia strategy in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.