Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268196›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2025

Allison Campolo, Esther Lara, Monica Crary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Genetic Classification of a Novel Genotype of the GenusTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allison CampoloMicrobiology, Alcon Research, LLC, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
Esther LaraMicrobiology, Alcon Research, LLC, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
Monica CraryMicrobiology, Alcon Research, LLC, Fort Worth, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: Results: Of the eight genotypes investigated, T7 and T18 possessed the largest trophozoite size while T5 was the smallest. T5 was consistently the fastest genotype over the 72-hour period in both the fed and starved conditions. Nutrient conditions did not show any consistent impact on the overall distance, speed, or encystment of any genotype within 72 hours. Finally, while some genotypes (T1, T11) demonstrated a relatively high percentage of encystment at the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour timepoints, the other genotypes demonstrated a relatively low encystment percentage at these same times. Discussion: Overall, these results indicate that eight of the common genotypes of

Indexed as

Acanthamoebacorneaencystmentkeratitismotility

Identifiers

PMID41268196
PMCPMC12626805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.