Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268193›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Unsupervized clustering reveals a tri-phenotype model of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Beirut cohort study and literature synthesis.

Christopher El Hadi, Rindala Saliba, Georges Maalouly, Moussa Riachy, Ghassan Sleilaty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher El HadiGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4167-4944
Rindala SalibaFaculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5635-0945
Georges MaaloulyFaculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3677-4609
Moussa RiachyFaculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2146-6945
Ghassan SleilatyFaculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19, caused by severe acure respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has posed unprecedented challenges globally, with diverse clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic and mild symptoms to severe and fatal illness. Identifying patient subgroups with distinct clinical profiles could enhance individualized treatment strategies. Clustering mixed clinical data offers a promising avenue for uncovering meaningful patterns; however, few algorithms effectively manage heterogeneous datasets. This study applied evidence-based clustering algorithms, that is, KAMILA and K-prototypes, to categorize COVID-19 patients on the basis of medical history and biochemical and radiological data. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 556 COVID-19 patients admitted to Hôtel Dieu de France Hospital in Beirut between March 2020 and October 2021. Only data collected within the first 24 hours of admission were used for clustering to ensure early prognostic relevance. After data cleaning, the missing values were imputed into 30 datasets. KAMILA and K-prototype algorithms were applied to these datasets, generating clusters ranging from two to six groups. The optimal clustering solution was determined via the silhouette, Calinski-Harabasz, and Dunn indices, followed by statistical analyses to characterize cluster-specific patient profiles and outcomes. Results: Clustering identified three distinct patient groups, with the KAMILA algorithm providing the best fit. Cluster 1 primarily included middle-aged male patients exhibiting elevated inflammatory markers, consistent oxygen requirements, and extended hospital stays. Cluster 2 included elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and high intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, requiring cautious anticoagulation and early antibiotic intervention. Cluster 3 included younger, generally healthier individuals who required minimal interventions and experienced low mortality. Conclusions: Mixed-data clustering revealed three COVID-19 patient clusters indicating the clinical meaningfulness and global reproducibility with prognostic and therapeutic implications. This unsupervised approach may inform early triage and resource allocation. Further prospective validation in diverse, vaccinated populations is warranted.

Indexed as

clusteringCOVID-19KAMILAK-prototypesmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41268193
PMCPMC12627362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.