ArticleDigital health
Agreement between Fitbit Versa 4 and a reference standard on time-domain nocturnal heart rate variability: A pilot study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) has been associated with impaired autonomic nervous system (ANS) adaptation, suggesting that HRV could serve as a biomarker for identifying ANS imbalances that may adversely affect an individual's overall health. Many wearable devices used outside medical settings provide measures of HRV, but clinimetric data on their reliability and agreement remain limited. The primary aim of this study was to assess the ability of the Fitbit Versa 4, a consumer-based wearable, to measure nocturnal HRV compared to a reference standard HRV measure obtained from an ambulatory ECG device, the Firstbeat Bodyguard 3. Methods: Eight participants simultaneously wore the Fitbit Versa 4 and Firstbeat Bodyguard 3 beginning at least one hour before sleep, throughout their sleep period, and for at least one hour after waking, over a minimum of three nights. HRV was quantified using the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD). A t-test assessed differences in median HRV between devices, while a Linear Mixed Model and Bland-Altman analysis evaluated relative difference and agreement, respectively. Results: The median RMSSD from Fitbit (21.660 ms [15.927, 22.821]) was not significantly different ( Conclusions: Strong correlation and acceptable agreement between Fitbit Versa 4 HRV measurements and reference standard HRV measurements derived from ECG provide preliminary support for using Fitbit Versa 4 to measure nocturnal HRV outside laboratory settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.