ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Evaluation of the quality of postoperative care in neurosurgery at a national referral hospital.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The quality of postoperative care is a critical determinant of patient safety in neurosurgery, particularly in low-resource settings. This study evaluated the quality of postoperative care in the neurosurgery department of Sylvanus Olympio University Hospital in Lomé, Togo. Methods: We conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional study from October to December 2024, including patients who underwent neurosurgical procedures and received postoperative care in the neurosurgery ward. Data were collected using a structured checklist, medical record audits, and patient satisfaction surveys. Results: A total of 51 patients were included (mean age: 37.1 ± 21.6 years; male-to-female ratio: 4.67). Traumatic brain injury accounted for 45% of surgical indications. Compliance with perioperative procedural standards was observed in 64.9% of cases, while only 13.7% of postoperative prescriptions adhered to standard protocols. Postoperative complications occurring during the inpatient hospital stay were observed in 13.7% of patients, and the mortality rate was 1.96%. Despite systemic shortcomings, 64.7% of patients reported overall satisfaction with their care. Conclusion: Substantial gaps remain in the application of standardized postoperative procedures, particularly in documentation and timing of care. Strengthening written protocols, enhancing staff training, and institutionalizing regular audits may improve neurosurgical outcomes in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.