ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Comparative analysis of laparoscopic and open enucleation for pediatric solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic-assisted versus open non-reconstructive pancreatic surgery in children with benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a two-center preliminary study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficiency of Various Pancreatic Enucleation Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Surgical and functional outcomes of pediatric pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: A retrospective study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study compares the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic enucleation (LEN) vs. open enucleation (OEN) for pediatric solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas, aiming to provide clinical evidence for optimizing treatment strategies. Methods: A retrospective analysis evaluated clinical data from 20 pediatric SPN patients undergoing enucleation at the Children's Hospital of Soochow University, with 9 in the LEN group and 11 in the OEN group. Data included baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, and complications. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups ( Conclusion: LEN reduces blood loss and postoperative pain in pediatric SPN treatment with comparable safety to OEN. Larger-scale studies with extended follow-up durations are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.