ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Insulin Resistance Indices Predict Mortality in Cardiovascular Disease: A Large-Scale NHANES Study With Machine Learning Validation.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insulin Resistance Indices Predict Mortality in Cardiovascular Disease: A Large-Scale NHANES Study With Machine Learning Validation.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insulin resistance (IR) is a key driver of cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of global mortality. This study evaluated the prognostic value of two surrogate IR indices-the McAuley index and the Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR)-for predicting all-cause and CVD mortality. Data from 22,308 NHANES participants with established CVD (1999-2018) was analyzed. Outcomes were all-cause and CVD mortality. Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic splines assessed associations, while machine learning methods (random forest, XGBoost, CoxBoost, DeepHit) evaluated predictive performance. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Over a median 9.2-year follow-up, 3484 deaths occurred, including 1093 from CVD. A higher McAuley Index was inversely associated with risk, with each 1-unit increase predicting a 9.2% reduction in all-cause and 11.3% reduction in CVD mortality. Higher METS-IR values were associated with increased mortality. Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed significant U-shaped relationships. Across nine models, the Cox model demonstrated the best performance (C-index: 0.87 for all-cause and 0.85 for CVD mortality), with time-dependent AUCs consistently above 0.8. SHAP analysis highlighted the McAuley Index and METS-IR as leading predictors. The McAuley Index and METS-IR are robust, independent predictors of all-cause and CVD mortality. Their integration with interpretable machine learning enhances risk stratification, underscoring the role of metabolic dysfunction and central adiposity in long-term outcomes. These indices may help identify high-risk patients who could benefit from targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.