ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025
Economic Barriers to Interventional Cardiology Care for Adults and Children With Congenital Heart Disease and Potential Policy Solutions: A SCAI Policy Statement.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Matched and Measured: An In-depth Look at the Interventional Cardiology Fellowship Match-Fellows' Perspective.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Structural Inequities in Pediatric Versus Adult Interventional Cardiology: A Lifetime Earnings and Productivity Analysis.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Water or Warrior? Women in Congenital Cardiac Interventions Reflect on Their Journeys.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- Different Hearts, Different Standards.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) patients needing interventional cardiology procedures require highly skilled physicians to deliver resource-intensive care. The current United States health care system presents multiple economic barriers. This includes payments from Medicaid, procedure values, physician compensation, and device development. In combination, these factors contribute to worse outcomes for CHD patients. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions is committed to removing these barriers for improved patient outcomes. This will require a coordinated effort with advocacy and education to change the current process and develop new approaches to delivering interventional cardiology care for CHD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.