Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268073›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025

Intravascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Gal Sella, Chloe Kharsa, Mangesh Kritya, Devin Olek, Bin S Teh, Muhammad Faraz Anwaar, Joseph Elias, Elia El Hajj, Albert E Raizner, Andrew Farach and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gal SellaThe Heart Center, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
Chloe KharsaDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Mangesh KrityaDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Devin OlekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Bin S TehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Muhammad Faraz AnwaarDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Joseph EliasDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Elia El HajjDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Albert E RaiznerDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Andrew FarachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Neal S KleimanDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
Alpesh ShahDepartment of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a significant challenge in coronary intervention, particularly among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who exhibit altered inflammatory responses and accelerated vascular calcification. Vascular brachytherapy has reemerged as a potential treatment modality for recurrent ISR. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of vascular brachytherapy for ISR in patients with and without CKD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 227 patients (54 in CKD and 173 in non-CKD groups) who underwent vascular brachytherapy for coronary ISR between June 2016 and January 2024 at the Houston Methodist Hospital. Patients were stratified based on the presence of CKD, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m Results: Baseline demographic characteristics and procedural characteristics were similar between groups, except for a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes in the CKD group (83.3% vs 57.8%; Conclusions: Despite similar procedural characteristics, patients with CKD experience significantly higher rates of adverse events following vascular brachytherapy for ISR than those without CKD patients. The nearly doubled rate of MACE and higher TLR rates suggest that the inflammatory milieu associated with CKD may overcome the antiproliferative effects of radiation therapy. These findings highlight the need for refined interventional strategies and comprehensive cardiovascular risk management in this high-risk population with MACE.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasecoronary interventionin-stent restenosisintravascular brachytherapytarget lesion revascularizationvascular brachytherapy

Identifiers

PMID41268073
PMCPMC12629730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.