ArticleInternational journal of food science2025
Nutritional, Rheological, and Sensory Assessment of Functional Toast Bread Fortified With Rye Flour and Basil Seed Gum Powder.
Article in International journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nutritional, Rheological, and Sensory Assessment of Functional Toast Bread Fortified With Rye Flour and Basil Seed Gum Powder.International journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing demand for functional foods has led to the exploration of alternative ingredients to enhance the nutritional and sensory qualities of bread. This study investigates rye flour (RF) and basil seed gum powder (BSGP) in functional toast bread, evaluating their impact on chemical composition, dough rheology, texture, and sensory properties. BSGP, extracted from basil seeds, was combined with RF at varying concentrations (0%, 15%, and 25% RF and 0%, 0.5%, and 1% BSGP) to produce six different formulations. Chemical analysis revealed that increasing RF and BSGP concentrations significantly enhanced moisture, ash, fat, and fiber content, with the highest concentrations (T6: 25% RF, 1% BSGP) showing the most substantial improvements. Rheological analysis indicated that BSGP reduced pasting temperature and peak viscosity, while higher RF concentrations increased adhesiveness and brittleness over time. Textural evaluations demonstrated that 1% BSGP optimally maintained springiness, while higher RF levels negatively affected texture, resulting in increased brittleness. Sensory analysis identified the combination of 0.5% BSGP and 15% RF (T3) as the most acceptable, balancing taste, texture, and color. Storage studies revealed that Day 1 samples exhibited higher moisture and springiness, whereas Day 5 samples showed increased hardness, brittleness, and adhesiveness, particularly in formulations with higher BSGP levels. Principal component analysis (PCA) captured these temporal trends, emphasizing the relationship between moisture, elasticity, and firmness. In conclusion, RF and BSGP enhance bread's nutritional and sensory properties but require precise formulation to optimize fresh and stored product quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.