ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2025
Assessing the Need for Imaging after Distal Radius Fracture Fixation.
Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- ESTES recommendations regarding distal radius fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Distal radius fractures are extremely common. Patients routinely undergo early imaging (around 2 weeks) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures despite no clinical concerns. We analyzed the need for these radiographs by evaluating when imaging identifies complications after surgery. Materials and Methods: All distal radius fractures treated with ORIF via a volar approach by the senior surgeon were included. Intraoperative and postoperative images were analyzed for maintenance of reduction and complications. Demographic data, fracture characteristics, and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results: A total of 342 patients were identified. Postoperative images were obtained from 0 to 14, 15 to 90, 91 to 180, 181 to 365, or greater than 365 days after surgery. Some patients had multiple images. Measurements on postoperative images were statistically equivalent across all time points. Complications mostly occurred >90 days after surgery. Of the 26 patients with complications, 5 had a failure of reduction or plating seen on postoperative imaging. Two occurred after unrelated trauma; only three patients had unanticipated complications caught on routine imaging within 3 months after surgery. These patients had extraordinarily complex fractures in poor bone stock. Conclusion: Early postoperative imaging is not necessary after ORIF for distal radius fractures unless the patient is elderly, or the fracture is severely comminuted with ulnar column or die-punch components. Thus, we suggest that patients have imaging only in the 3- to 6-month period to determine if the union has been achieved, which could provide cost savings to both surgeon and patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.