ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2025
Kirschner's Wire versus Casts in Wrist Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Distal radius fractures are a common orthopaedic injury with several treatment methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize the results of the latest randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and compare the functional outcomes and rates of complications in Kirschner's wire (K-wire) fixation versus cast immobilization in the management of distal radius fractures. Materials and Methods: A systematic electronic search of Embase, PubMed, and Scopus was performed from inception through to July 26, 2024. All articles addressing RCTs comparing plaster cast immobilization and K-wire fixation in distal radius fractures were included. This study was performed according to the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool for RCTs. Results: A total of nine studies with 1,097 patients (580 and 517 who underwent cast immobilization and K-wire fixation, respectively) were included for analysis. There was a significantly higher risk of complications (risk ratio [RR]: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-2.78; Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significantly higher risk of total adverse events and malunion in cast immobilization than K-wiring as well as a significant difference in PRWE scores at 12 months. Our results thus suggest that K-wiring is more favorable than cast immobilization in the management of distal radius fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.