ArticleHealthcare technology letters
Automatic Annotations by Augmented Reality-Enabled Laparoscopic Surgery.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automatic Annotations by Augmented Reality-Enabled Laparoscopic Surgery.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate labels of surgical procedures such as image segmentations or interaction labels are paramount for many of today's medical image computing tasks. Creating a dataset with these labels requires a great deal of manual work and relies on the involvement of medical experts, which is very time-consuming and costly. We propose a pathway for the automatic generation of such labels utilizing the spatial and temporal registration between a patient, the anatomical model, tracked surgical instruments, and the surgeon's view of the patient. These requirements for the automatic generation of labels are identical to the requirements of many navigated and augmented reality (AR) enabled surgeries. The AR system, through 3D registration, has the defining ability to accurately overlay real objects with their virtual counterparts. Our approach collects the complete raw data (e.g. video, tracking data, calibrations etc.) that feeds a live laparoscopic AR system for later analysis. By converting these complete recordings of the surgery into different representations, the AR system generates valuable datasets as mere by-products. Additionally, as our approach does not rely on visual input alone but on additional 3D information, the system can create labels even if the visual input is occluded or a tool interacts with tissue outside of the view of the laparoscopic camera. In this paper, we present a realization of this concept, then evolve this foundational idea into an interactive system that assists users in annotating surgical data. Finally, we gather and analyse feedback from six participants to evaluate the efficacy and user-friendliness of our system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.