ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2025
Student Peer Assessment in Clinical Operative Dentistry: A Retrospective Study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validity and Reliability of Rubrics for Assessment of Preclinical Orthodontic Practices in Dental Students.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare peer assessment with instructors' assessment of cavity preparations prepared by undergraduate dental students in operative clinical sessions and to assess the effect of different variables such as gender, academic year of the students, and timing on the reliability and accuracy of the peer assessments. Methods: A retrospective cohort study evaluating 2715 cavities prepared by undergraduate dental students and assessed by instructors and peers using a standardized grading rubric utilized formally within the operative courses. The effect of gender, level of academic year, and timing of assessment was studied. Descriptive statistics and paired sample Results: Significantly higher ( Conclusion: Peer assessment is reliable in gauging the level of understanding and clinical judgment skills of undergraduate dental students. It is recommended to employ peer assessment as a reliable strategy in the active learning process in dental operative clinical courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.