Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267857›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Synthetic data generation of health and demographic surveillance systems data: a case study in a low- and middle-income country.

Dorcas G Mwigereri, Nigel T Kamotho, Akbar K Waljee, Ryan T Rego, Eileen M Weinheimer-Haus, Farhana Alarakhiya, Anthony K Ngugi, W Nicholson Price, Ji Zhu, Stephen Peter Wong and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dorcas G MwigereriDepartment of Population Health, The Aga Khan University, 30270-00100 Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1142-1574
Nigel T KamothoData Innovation Office, Aga Khan Univeristy, 30270-00100 Nairobi, Kenya.
Akbar K WaljeeDepartment of Population Health, The Aga Khan University, 30270-00100 Nairobi, Kenya.
Ryan T RegoCenter for Global Health Equity, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Eileen M Weinheimer-HausCenter for Global Health Equity, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Farhana AlarakhiyaData Innovation Office, Aga Khan Univeristy, 30270-00100 Nairobi, Kenya.
Anthony K NgugiDepartment of Population Health, The Aga Khan University, 30270-00100 Nairobi, Kenya.
W Nicholson PriceDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Ji ZhuDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Stephen Peter WongData Innovation Office, Aga Khan Univeristy, 30270-00100 Nairobi, Kenya.
Geoffrey H SiwoCenter for Global Health Equity, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of open-source generative models in producing high-quality tabular synthetic data using a Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) dataset from rural Kenya, as a proof of concept in a low- and middle-income (LMIC) setting. Materials and Methods: Three open-source models (CTGAN, TableGAN, and CopulaGAN) were used to generate synthetic data from the Kaloleni/Rabai HDSS dataset. To assess the quality of the synthetic datasets generated by each model, we performed fidelity, utility, and privacy tests. Results: CTGAN outperformed the other models, producing synthetic data that closely mirrored the statistical properties of the real dataset while preserving privacy. Both CopulaGAN and TableGAN performed poorly, with TableGAN completely failing to generate realistic synthetic data. For the utility tests, Random Forest models trained on CTGAN-generated synthetic data achieved comparable performance to models trained on real data (accuracy: 72.4% vs 72.0%, Discussion: CTGAN demonstrated superior performance in generating high-quality synthetic tabular HDSS data. CopulaGAN and TableGAN produced lower quality data, though these results may not generalize to other datasets. Conclusion: Synthetic data generation of tabular data using HDSS data, particularly via CTGAN, may enhance the accessibility of datasets in LMICs by creating synthetic datasets that preserve the characteristics and statistical properties of the original data, while upholding privacy and confidentiality.

Indexed as

AIgenerative adversarial networksHDSShealth and demographic surveillance systemsmachine learningsynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID41267857
PMCPMC12628187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.