ArticleJAMIA open2025
Proportion of alcohol use disorder diagnoses in electronic health records documented with stigmatized descriptors: a comparison across race, ethnicity, and sex.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In a sample of patients with diagnosed alcohol use disorder (AUD), we examined the prevalence of both stigmatizing (eg, "alcohol abuse") and highly stigmatizing, non-medical descriptors (eg, "alcoholic") documented in electronic health records (EHRs). We also assessed whether the use of these terms-entered by clinicians when documenting AUD using search tools and picklists-varied across patient subgroups within a regional health system. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Measurements: This study used EHR data from AUD diagnoses documented (January 3, 2015-May 5, 2023) for adult primary care patients identified as Asian, Black, Latine, or White. Four researchers classified AUD descriptors used to diagnose AUD as "stigmatizing" or "highly stigmatizing." Stigmatizing AUD descriptors were terms that carry negative connotations, imply blame, moral failing, or character flaws. Highly stigmatizing AUD descriptors were non-standard medical terms with strong negative connotations. Results: Among 61 886 AUD diagnoses (18 068 patients: 3.5% Asian, 5.0% Black, 5.9% Latine, 85.6% White; 40.5% women), stigmatizing descriptors were used in 88.5% and highly stigmatizing in 18.6% of diagnoses. Differences across intersectional subgroups were minimal. Conclusion: Most AUD descriptors were stigmatizing (1 in 5 highly stigmatizing), with men showing slightly higher prevalence than women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.