Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267846›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025

Access and reimbursement of ambulatory cardiac monitoring across Europe.

Giuseppe Boriani, Johannes Brachmann, Thorsten Lewalter, David J Wright, Patrick Badertscher, Chris P Gale, José Luis Merino, Helmut Pürerfellner, Gregory Y H Lip

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giuseppe BorianiCardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Via del Pozzo, 71, Modena 41124, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9820-4815
Johannes BrachmannMedical School Regiomed, Regiomed-Kliniken Coburg Germany and University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
Thorsten LewalterDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Unit Care, Hospital Munich South, Peter Osypka Heart Center, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4056-6696
David J WrightLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Patrick BadertscherDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9751-0557
Chris P GaleDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4732-382X
José Luis MerinoLa Paz University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Idipaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1737-1903
Helmut PürerfellnerDepartment of Electrophysiology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria.
Gregory Y H LipLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool and Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ambulatory cardiac monitoring (ACM) allows long-term electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring to detect arrhythmias with different modalities, ranging from short-term Holter monitoring (up to 48 h) to long-term continuous patch ECG monitors (up to 14 days), external event recorders (up to 30 days), and implantable loop recorders (ILRs). Access and reimbursement for ACM across Europe are not well understood. We performed a systematic review and analysis to understand ACM reimbursement across Europe, including a review of the reimbursement systems in each country and a detailed inspection of clinical coding and provider reimbursement. Level of reimbursement is dependent on many factors, including clinical setting (inpatient, outpatient, and day case), hospital length of stay, diagnosis, complications/severity, geographical location, hospital type, and device model and manufacturer. In most countries, reimbursement is performed for the monitoring procedure itself, without considering the time extension of monitoring and the specific type of device used for monitoring. The monetary value of reimbursement varies by country for both ACM and ILR [for Holter from €17.49 to €939.78 and for ILR from €416.14 (provider reimbursement only) to €18,718 (provider reimbursement bundled with ILR device)]. Holter and ILR are universally reimbursed, but newer ACM technologies with extended duration of monitoring, including long-term continuous monitoring and event recorders, are not. Across Europe, we found large variation in monetary values for reimbursement for ACM and ILR. We also found limited reimbursement and access to longer-duration ACM technologies. These findings suggest heterogeneous and problematic access to evidence-based tools for longer-duration monitoring.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Cardiac MonitoringEquitable AccessInnovationReimbursement

Identifiers

PMID41267846
PMCPMC12629646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.