Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267844›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025

Automated evaluation for pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade with echocardiographic artificial intelligence.

I Min Chiu, Yuki Sahashi, Milos Vukadinovic, Paul P Cheng, Susan Cheng, David Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

I Min ChiuDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., Suite A3600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Yuki SahashiDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., Suite A3600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Milos VukadinovicDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., Suite A3600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Paul P ChengDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Susan ChengDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., Suite A3600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
David OuyangDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., Suite A3600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3813-7518

Funding

Deep Learning Based Phenotyping and Outcomes Prediction for Valvular Heart DiseaseR01HL173526 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Ouyang · 2024 to 2026
$2.5M
Artificial Intelligence Imaging Biomarkers of Longitudinal Cardiovascular StressR01HL173487 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI David Ouyang · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
Deep Learning Assessment of the Right Ventricle: Function, Etiology, and PrognosisR00HL157421 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI OUYANG, DAVID · 2023 to 2025
$747k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL157421NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL173487NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL173526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Timely and accurate detection of pericardial effusion and assessment of cardiac tamponade remain challenging and highly operator dependent. Objectives: Artificial intelligence has advanced many echocardiographic assessments, and we aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model to automate the assessment of pericardial effusion severity and cardiac tamponade from echocardiogram videos. Methods and results: We developed a deep learning model (EchoNet-Pericardium) using temporal-spatial convolutional neural networks to automate pericardial effusion severity grading and tamponade detection from echocardiography videos. The model was trained using a retrospective dataset of 1 427 660 videos from 85 380 echocardiograms at Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre (CSMC) to predict PE severity and cardiac tamponade across individual echocardiographic views and an ensemble approach combining predictions from five standard views. External validation was performed on 33 310 videos from 1806 echocardiograms from Stanford Healthcare (SHC). In the held-out CSMC test set, EchoNet-Pericardium achieved an AUC of 0.900 (95% CI: 0.884-0.916) for detecting moderate or larger pericardial effusion, 0.942 (95% CI: 0.917-0.964) for large pericardial effusion, and 0.955 (95% CI: 0.939-0.968) for cardiac tamponade. In the SHC external validation cohort, the model achieved AUCs of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.794-0.933) for moderate or larger pericardial effusion, 0.959 (95% CI: 0.945-0.972) for large pericardial effusion, and 0.966 (95% CI: 0.906-0.995) for cardiac tamponade. Subgroup analysis demonstrated consistent performance across ages, sexes, left ventricular ejection fraction, and atrial fibrillation statuses. Conclusion: Our deep learning-based framework accurately grades pericardial effusion severity and detects cardiac tamponade from echocardiograms, demonstrating consistent performance and generalizability across different cohorts. This automated tool has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making by reducing operator dependence and expediting diagnosis.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCardiac tamponadeDeep learningEchocardiographyPericardial effusion

Identifiers

PMID41267844
PMCPMC12629644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.