ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
The development of a data dictionary with clinical variables for artificial intelligence-driven tools in research on abdominal aortic aneurysms and peripheral arterial disease.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Medical Records to AI-Ready Datasets: A Practical Guide for Clinical Researchers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Real-life clinical validation of artificial intelligence-assisted echocardiography for aortic root and left ventricular outflow tract measurements against human readers and cardiac magnetic resonance.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and peripheral arterial disease (arterial vascular diseases) carry a high disease burden and are likely to experience cardiovascular events. Novel strategies using artificial intelligence could identify which patients with arterial vascular diseases are at high risk of cardiovascular disease progression. Structured data dictionaries are needed to ensure high-quality, unbiased, and ethically sound data input for artificial intelligence models. The aim of this study was to obtain expert consensus-based data dictionaries that adhere to applicable ethical guidelines to support research on arterial vascular diseases. Methods and results: The data dictionaries were created through a modified Delphi approach to achieve consensus among key opinion leaders in the cardiovascular field. First, data requirements were defined and variable longlists were created per disease through a literature review. Secondly, written feedback rounds were held. Lastly, face-to-face meetings were held to establish consensus on the final data dictionaries. During the whole process, ethical and legal experts on trustworthy artificial intelligence were involved to ensure adherence to corresponding guidelines and laws. The aneurysm data dictionary contains 312 variables, and the peripheral arterial disease data dictionary contains 325 variables. A total of 16 clinical experts were involved in the creation, including 12 vascular surgeons, two vascular medicine specialists, one cardiologist, and one gastroenterology surgeon and digital health expert. Conclusion: Two expert consensus-based data dictionaries for use in clinical and artificial intelligence research on arterial vascular diseases were created, developed for application in research on predicting disease progression and cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.