ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
A deep learning-based pipeline for large-scale echocardiography data curation and measurements.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Where Do We Stand?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Echocardiography: From Literacy to Leadership, Redefining Roles, Responsibilities, and Sustainability in the Artificial Intelligence-driven Echocardiography Era.Journal of cardiovascular echographyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Echocardiographic image data accumulating in echo labs are a highly valuable but underutilized resource for cardiac imaging research. Despite the availability of large image databases, quantitative measurements required for clinical analysis and research remain limited. Retrospective manual measurements are highly time-consuming and susceptible to operator-related variability. Moreover, data curation and quality control metrics are needed to prepare real-world data for analysis. Methods: Deep learning-based image analysis can provide fully automated, rapid, and consistent extraction of measurements, given that the data have been properly curated. In this work, we develop an automated pipeline for data curation of a large echo database of 14 326 exams from 9678 patients and evaluate automated measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial volume index (LAVI) as a use case. Results: In validation subsample of 1763 subjects with varying image quality and cardiac diseases and 1488 healthy subjects, the pipeline output was compared with manual measurements. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias [standard deviation (SD)] of -1.8% (7.6%) for LVEF and 3.3 mL/m² (8.1 mL/m²) for LAVI and demonstrated robust performance for varying image quality and pathological conditions. Additionally, in the large part of the database of 9678 exams without clinical measurements, the automated data curation and measurement quality control resulted in 79% measured data with high confidence. Conclusion: This work highlights the potential of deep learning-based automated measurements in echocardiography for data mining in large real-world databases, paving the way for advancements in cardiac imaging research and diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.