Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267839›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025

A multi-query, multimodal, receiver-augmented solution to extract contemporary cardiology guideline information using large language models.

Robert M Radke, Gerhard-Paul Diller, Rohan G Reddy, Pushpa Shivaram, David A Danford, Shelby Kutty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert M RadkeDepartment of Cardiology III-Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5055-2220
Gerhard-Paul DillerDepartment of Cardiology III-Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Rohan G ReddyDepartment of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pushpa ShivaramDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Augusta, Augusta, GA, USA.
David A DanfordAcademic Programs, BayCare Health System, 2985 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33759, USA.
Shelby KuttyAcademic Programs, BayCare Health System, 2985 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33759, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the current study was to assess the utility of a state-of-the-art large language model (LLM) based on curated, defined clinical practice recommendations to support clinicians in obtaining point-of-care guidelines for individual patient treatment while maintaining transparency. Methods and results: We combined cloud-based and locally run LLMs with versatile open-source tools to form a multi-query, multimodal, retrieval-augmented generation chain that closely reflects European cardiology guidelines in its responses. We compared the performance of this generation chain to other LLMs including GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on a 306-question multiple-choice exam with questions consisting of short patient vignettes from various cardiology subspecialties, originally written to prepare candidates for the European Exam in Core Cardiology. On the multiple-choice test, our system demonstrated overall accuracy of 73.53%, while GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 had overall accuracies of 44.03 and 62.26%, respectively. Our system outperformed GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for the following categories of questions: coronary artery disease, arrhythmia, other, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathies, endocarditis, adult congenital heart disease, pericardial disease, cardio-oncology, pulmonary hypertension, and non-cardiac surgery. For maximum transparency, the system also provided reference quotes for its recommendations. Conclusion: Our system demonstrated superior performance in question-answering tasks on a set of core cardiology questions as compared with contemporary publicly available chat models. The current study illustrates that LLMs can be tailored to provide documented and accountable guideline recommendations towards actual clinical needs while ensuring recommendations are derived from up-to-date, trustable, and traceable documents.

Indexed as

Clinical practice guidelinesLarge language modelRetrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID41267839
PMCPMC12629642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.