Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267835›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025

Cardiac surveillance of childhood cancer using artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiograms.

Ivor B Asztalos, Amy Li, Victoria L Vetter, John K Triedman, Joshua Mayourian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivor B AsztalosDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amy LiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Victoria L VetterDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John K TriedmanDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Joshua MayourianDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: To assess the potential for artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) to serve as a long-term cardiac surveillance tool and predict left ventricular systolic dysfunction in childhood cancer patients. Methods and results: We assessed performance of our previously established AI-ECG model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% and ≤40% in patients with childhood cancer during internal testing (Boston Children's Hospital) and external validation (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia). The internal test cohort comprised 447 patients [57% male; age at cancer diagnosis 11.2 (5.4-15.7) years; 1553 ECG-echo pairs at median age 13.5 (IQR 7.7-17.9) years; 6.4% with LVEF ≤50%; 1.3% with LVEF ≤40%], 28% with leukaemia, 16% with lymphoma, 8% with neuroblastoma, 8% with sarcoma, 2% with gastrointestinal cancers, 3% with genitourinary cancers, 6% with central nervous system cancers, 11% with other/unspecified cancers, and 18% with missing/unknown cancer labels. Treatment strategies included anthracyclines (35%), bone marrow transplant (7%), and radiation (1%). The external test cohort comprised 2964 patients [55.4% male; 7054 ECG-echo pairs at median age 11.6 (IQR 6.8-15.1) years; 2.5% with LVEF ≤50%; 0.9% with LVEF ≤40%]. Similar AUROCs (0.80-0.85), sensitivities (0.75-0.82), NPVs (0.986-0.996), and percent predicted negative (51-65%) were obtained across institutions to predict LVEF ≤50%, outperforming a biomarker-based model benchmark. Patients with high AI-ECG risk scores for LVEF ≤50% had higher rates of mortality [hazard ratio 3.1 (95% CI 1.8-5.3), Conclusion: AI-ECG shows promise as a digital biomarker for cardiac surveillance in the vulnerable childhood cancer survivor population.

Indexed as

AI-ECGCardio-oncologyCardio-toxicityChildhood cancerLeft ventricular systolic dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41267835
PMCPMC12629641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.