Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267813›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Functional partitioning through competitive learning.

Marius Tacke, Matthias Busch, Kevin Linka, Christian Cyron, Roland Aydin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marius TackeInstitute of Material Systems Modeling, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany.
Matthias BuschInstitute for Continuum and Material Mechanics, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Kevin LinkaInstitute for Continuum and Material Mechanics, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian CyronInstitute of Material Systems Modeling, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany.
Roland AydinInstitute of Material Systems Modeling, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Datasets often incorporate various functional patterns related to different aspects or regimes, which are typically not equally present throughout the dataset. We propose a novel partitioning algorithm that utilizes competition between models to detect and separate these functional patterns. This competition is induced by multiple models iteratively submitting their predictions for the dataset, with the best prediction for each data point being rewarded with training on that data point. This reward mechanism amplifies each model's strengths and encourages specialization in different patterns. The specializations can then be translated into a partitioning scheme. We validate our concept with datasets with clearly distinct functional patterns, such as mechanical stress and strain data in a porous structure. Our partitioning algorithm produces valuable insights into the datasets' structure, which can serve various further applications. As a demonstration of one exemplary usage, we set up modular models consisting of multiple expert models, each learning a single partition, and compare their performance on more than twenty popular regression problems with single models learning all partitions simultaneously. Our results show significant improvements, with up to 56% loss reduction, confirming our algorithm's utility.

Indexed as

clusteringcompetitive learningmachine learningpartitioningunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID41267813
PMCPMC12626917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.