Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267790›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025

Enhancing human strength via neural modulation: mechanisms of maximal voluntary contraction and translational interventions.

Yudai Takarada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yudai TakaradaFaculty of Sports Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) is a key determinant of human strength, mobility and functional performance. While muscle morphology contributes to MVC force, neural factors-particularly cortical and spinal excitability and inhibition-play a central role in motor unit recruitment. Despite its importance, the neurophysiological mechanisms regulating MVC remain underrepresented in literature. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the neural substrates of MVC, including intracortical inhibition, descending drive, afferent feedback, and neuroplasticity within the primary motor cortex (M1) and the corticospinal tract. A structured search of PubMed and Google Scholar identified studies examining both mechanisms and interventions. Intervention strategies were categorized into four domains: cognitive-behavioral techniques (e.g., verbal encouragement, unconscious goal priming), afferent-driven approaches, pharmacological modulation, and neuromodulatory stimulation. Studies were appraised for methodological rigor and translational relevance, highlighting the latent capacity of the motor system to exceed conventional MVC thresholds through targeted modulation of excitatory and inhibitory circuits. Evidence supports the efficacy of neuromodulatory and cognitive interventions in enhancing MVC force, particularly in older adults, athletes, and clinical populations. However, variability in protocols and outcome measures limits the comparability across studies. Further research is warranted to clarify the neurophysiological basis of MVC enhancement and to develop optimized, context-specific strategies for rehabilitation and performance.

Indexed as

afferent feedbackdescending driveintracortical inhibitionM1maximal voluntary contractionMVC forceneuroplasticityprimary motor cortex

Identifiers

PMID41267790
PMCPMC12626800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.