Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267789›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

Heart disease prediction using hybrid TabNet architecture with stacked ensemble learning.

Rizwana Yasmeen, Lal Khan, Ahyoung Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rizwana YasmeenDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Modern Languages (NUML), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Lal KhanDepartment of AI and SW, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Ahyoung ChoiDepartment of AI and SW, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of death worldwide, and early detection is critical for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes. However, current prediction tools are often limited by noisy, heterogeneous patient data and modest accuracy. To address this challenge, we propose a stacked ensemble framework that integrates: TabNet, a deep learning model that can identify the most relevant clinical features, and XGBoost, a powerful tree-based method known for its robustness. Their outputs are integrated using a Logistic Regression (LR) or Support Vector Machine (SVM) as meta learner, creating a system that balances accuracy and interpretability. Testing on Kaggle and UCI CVD datasets demonstrate that our ensemble consistently outperforms baseline models across accuracy, F1-score, precision, recall, ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, and matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). These results suggest that combining deep learning with tree-based models offers a practical way to improve risk prediction, supporting clinicians in making more reliable decisions for early CVD detection.

Indexed as

cardiovascular riskclinical decision supportensemble learningheart diseasemachine learningTabNetXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41267789
PMCPMC12626807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.