ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025
Vision toolkit part 2. features and metrics for assessing oculomotor signal: a review.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual System Alterations for Identifying Teacher-Reported Academic Difficulties in Schoolchildren: A Machine Learning Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Construction and analysis of a packaging design preference model using eye-tracking degree of preference.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Vision toolkit part 3. Scanpaths and derived representations for gaze behavior characterization: a review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye movement analysis provides critical insights across domains such as perception, cognition, neurological diagnostics, and human-computer interaction. However, reliable quantification of oculomotor remains challenging due to the lack of clear boundaries between fixations, saccades, and smooth pursuits, or variability across individuals and contexts. This article reviews methods for segmenting oculometry data into canonical oculomotor events, and the computational tools that can be used to characterize them. Binary segmentation employs mostly threshold-based algorithms and learning-based algorithms to distinguish fixations from saccades. Ternary segmentation additionally considers smooth pursuits using primarily threshold-based approaches and deep learning techniques. The common challenges in the practical application of segmentation algorithms are highlighted, namely, parameter sensitivity, noise, and head movement artifacts in mobile eye trackers, and emphasize the need for standardized benchmarks. The usual oculomotor metrics that can be inferred from the canonical movements are described, encompassing temporal, spatial, and kinematic features. The critical insights they provide for cognitive and clinical research in fields such as reading comprehension, neurological disorder diagnostics, and sensorimotor development, are outlined. Finally, relatively underexplored methods from signal processing, including spectral, stochastic, and topological methods, are presented. Their potential in revealing oscillatory patterns and structural complexities in gaze dynamics is detailed. Together, these approaches enhance our understanding of eye movement behavior, with significant implications for psychology, neuroscience, and human-computer interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.