ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Comparative study on dynamic visual tracking abilities in three-dimensional multi-object tracking tasks among basketball players of different skill levels.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance of clay pigeon shooters in multiple object tracking under different target loads: skill level and gender differences.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine whether high-level basketball players exhibit superior multi-object tracking abilities compared to low-level basketball players using the three-dimensional multi-object tracking (3D-MOT) task paradigm. Methods: Forty-eight participants (24 high-level and 24 low-level basketball players) from a university in Jiangsu were recruited. A 2 × 4 mixed experimental design was employed, with group (high vs. low) and tracking load as independent variables, and reaction time and accuracy in the 3D-MOT task as dependent variables. Results: The main effect of tracking load was significant, with tracking accuracy showing a linear decrease as the number of targets increased. The main effect of athletic level was also significant: while both groups showed reduced performance with increasing target numbers, high-level basketball players maintained higher accuracy and shorter reaction times under greater tracking loads. Conclusion: High-level basketball players outperformed low-level basketball players in multi-object tracking tasks, demonstrating superior adaptability and stability in dynamic visual information processing. Specifically, they maintained more accurate and efficient tracking performance when faced with complex task demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.