Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267775›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Comparative study on dynamic visual tracking abilities in three-dimensional multi-object tracking tasks among basketball players of different skill levels.

Zhi Guo, Qiulin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhi GuoCollege of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qiulin WangCollege of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine whether high-level basketball players exhibit superior multi-object tracking abilities compared to low-level basketball players using the three-dimensional multi-object tracking (3D-MOT) task paradigm. Methods: Forty-eight participants (24 high-level and 24 low-level basketball players) from a university in Jiangsu were recruited. A 2 × 4 mixed experimental design was employed, with group (high vs. low) and tracking load as independent variables, and reaction time and accuracy in the 3D-MOT task as dependent variables. Results: The main effect of tracking load was significant, with tracking accuracy showing a linear decrease as the number of targets increased. The main effect of athletic level was also significant: while both groups showed reduced performance with increasing target numbers, high-level basketball players maintained higher accuracy and shorter reaction times under greater tracking loads. Conclusion: High-level basketball players outperformed low-level basketball players in multi-object tracking tasks, demonstrating superior adaptability and stability in dynamic visual information processing. Specifically, they maintained more accurate and efficient tracking performance when faced with complex task demands.

Indexed as

attention featuresbasketball playersdynamic visual processingthree-dimensional multi-object trackingtracking ability

Identifiers

PMID41267775
PMCPMC12627010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.