Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267768›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Research on visual search strategies during apparatus throw-and-catch in group rhythmic gymnastics.

Chuncen Zhou, Yujun Cai, Kai Li, Xinmiao Zhang, Changhao Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chuncen ZhouSchool of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Yujun CaiSchool of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Kai LiCollege of Sports Industry and Leisure, Nanjing Sport Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xinmiao ZhangSchool of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Changhao TangSchool of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the visual search characteristics and strategies of expert rhythmic gymnasts during apparatus throw-and-catch tasks under different apparatus types and difficulty levels, in order to provide theoretical support for optimizing routine choreography and designing effective visual training programs. Methods: Fifteen rhythmic gymnasts at or above the national first-class level were recruited. Tobii Pro Glasses 3 wearable eye tracker was used to collect eye movement data during four throw-and-catch tasks of varying difficulty levels (Hoop 1-3, Ball 4). Global eye movement metrics (total duration of whole fixations, number of whole fixations, number of saccades) and area of interest (AOI) indicators (total duration of fixation, total duration of visit, total duration of glances, etc.) were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests and Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons. Results: As task difficulty increased, athletes showed significantly longer total fixation duration, more fixation points, and more saccades ( Conclusion: Expert rhythmic gymnasts actively adjust their visual strategies based on task complexity and apparatus characteristics, showing goal-oriented behaviors and evidence of experience transfer. Visual search efficiency is jointly influenced by movement difficulty and apparatus type. It is recommended that future training incorporates task-specific visual training programs to enhance throw-and-catch success rates and overall performance.

Indexed as

apparatus exchangeeye-trackingrhythmic gymnasticstask difficultyvisual search

Identifiers

PMID41267768
PMCPMC12626983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.