Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267765›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Virtual reality programs targeting executive functions and social cognition evaluation and/or rehabilitation in children with ADHD or ASD-A narrative review.

Filippia Doulou, Pascale Piolino, Nathalie Angeard

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filippia DoulouLaboratoire Mémoire, Cerveau et Cognition (UR 7536), Institut de Psychologie, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Pascale PiolinoLaboratoire Mémoire, Cerveau et Cognition (UR 7536), Institut de Psychologie, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Nathalie AngeardLaboratoire Mémoire, Cerveau et Cognition (UR 7536), Institut de Psychologie, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various studies have underlined the possible effectiveness of innovative techniques, such as virtual reality (VR), during the assessment or the rehabilitation of cognition in clinical pediatric populations. This study aims to (a) review the VR environments designed to assess and/or enhance executive functions (EFs) and theory of mind (ToM) domains in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders and (b) evaluate the sensitivity and the efficacy of these VR tools. Following an overview of these studies (e.g., purpose and results), our study has two further goals: (1) to provide the methodological dimensions of each study (target skills/processes and clinical populations), and (2) to highlight the VR characteristics (e.g., sense of presence and immersive experience, the user's point of view) implemented in the selected articles. A total of 75 studies published between 1996 and 2022 and fulfilling the selected criteria were found on database platforms such as PubMed or Science Direct. Our review demonstrates that VR could be useful as an assessment and training tool for cognitive and social impairments in pediatric clinical populations. However, the numerous clinical and VR designs highlight the need to develop a more systematic evaluation of VR programs to define what really works, especially in terms of generalization to more naturalistic settings.

Indexed as

ADHDASDassessmentneurodevelopmental disorderspediatric populationtrainingvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41267765
PMCPMC12626792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.