Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267763›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Enhancing musical creativity through AI: a chain-mediation model of self-efficacy and emotional intelligence.

Tingzheng Wang, Junhan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tingzheng WangSchool of Art, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Junhan ZhangDepartment of Music, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid advancement of AI technology is fundamentally transforming traditional music creation and influencing music education. However, whether and how the use of AI genuinely enhances musical creativity remains a subject for further exploration. This study aims to investigate the impact of AI usage on the musical creativity of music majors. Methods: Grounded in the "zone of proximal development" and social cognitive theory, this study constructed a theoretical model. The model introduced "musical self-efficacy" and "musical emotional intelligence" as mediating variables to explore the role of individual psychological factors. A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing questionnaire surveys and structural equation modeling (SEM) to analyze the relationships. Results: The findings revealed that: (1) The use of AI had a significant positive impact on enhancing musical creativity. (2) Musical emotional intelligence mediated the relationship between AI use and creativity, suggesting that individuals with higher emotional intelligence could better leverage AI. (3) Musical self-efficacy also served as a mediator, indicating that one's belief in their own abilities influenced the effectiveness of AI tool use. (4) Music self-efficacy and music emotional intelligence acted as sequential mediators, highlighting the important moderating role of psychological factors between technology and creativity. Discussion: This study deepens the understanding of the relationship between AI technology and musical creativity. It provides practical guidance for higher music education, emphasizing the need to cultivate students' self-efficacy and emotional intelligence in AI-assisted creative environments to achieve a synergistic development of technology and creativity.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)emotional intelligencemusical creativitymusic compositionself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID41267763
PMCPMC12626962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.