Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267753›Full record

ArticleVeterinary record open2025

A cross-sectional study of conflict-handling modes among first-year veterinary students.

Katherine E McCool, April A Kedrowicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary record open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine E McCoolSmall Animal Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences NC State University Raleigh North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-8296
April A KedrowiczDepartment of Clinical Sciences NC State University Raleigh North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6464-2294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Veterinary medical care requires communication and collaboration among members of the veterinary team. Coordinating the efforts of diverse team members can increase the potential for conflict, which can adversely impact team satisfaction and patient care when not managed productively. Awareness of conflict management styles and self-awareness of one's own preferred mode(s) of navigating conflict are imperative to enhancing a broader understanding of conflict. The purpose of this pilot study was to characterise first-year veterinary medical students' preferred modes of conflict management at a single institution. Methods: Eighty-seven students ( Results: Results revealed that accommodating ( Limitations: Our results are based on self-reported data at a single point in time and may not translate to real-world behaviour. Future research pursuits will focus on exploring how the conflict styles of veterinary students may change over time as they progress through their training and professional socialisation. Conclusion: This research suggests an opportunity for additional training in how to navigate conflict, with specific instruction on assertive and cooperative approaches to resolution. Future educational interventions related to conflict management training should be explored and additional research is needed to evaluate the most effective ways in which to incorporate these skills into veterinary medical training.

Indexed as

communicationcompetencyconflict

Identifiers

PMID41267753
PMCPMC12626764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.