ArticleCureus2025
Effectiveness of Single Miniplate Fixation for Mandibular Symphysis and Parasymphysis Fractures: A Clinical Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Symphysis and parasymphysis fractures are common in maxillofacial trauma, requiring precise management to restore form, function, and aesthetics. While Champy's technique recommends two miniplates - superior and inferior - for optimal stability, placing a superior plate in the canine-premolar region risks damaging dental roots and neurovascular structures. Additionally, the cost of dual plating may be a burden in low-resource settings. This study evaluates the efficacy of a single miniplate at the inferior border, aided by an arch bar as a tension band, for managing these fractures. Methods This prospective clinical study included 15 patients presenting with isolated mandibular symphysis or parasymphysis fractures. All fractures were managed using a single 2.5 mm miniplate along the inferior mandibular border, with an arch bar serving as a tension band across the dental arch. Patients were evaluated postoperatively for the incidence of surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, malunion or nonunion, malocclusion, miniplate fracture, and neurosensory deficits. Cost implications related to avoiding the use of a second miniplate were also analyzed. Follow-up was conducted for a minimum of four weeks postoperatively. Results The study observed that single miniplate fixation in combination with an arch bar provided satisfactory clinical outcomes in most cases. There were no significant incidences of postoperative infection, plate fracture, or malocclusion. Neurosensory complications were minimal and comparable to standard dual-plate protocols. Importantly, the reduction in hardware usage translated to lower overall treatment costs, offering a substantial benefit for patients from economically constrained backgrounds. Conclusion Single miniplate fixation along the inferior border of the mandible, when augmented with a tension band in the form of an arch bar, appears to be a reliable and cost-effective alternative for the management of symphysis and parasymphysis fractures. This technique minimizes iatrogenic risk to adjacent anatomical structures and offers a financially feasible solution, particularly in low-resource settings. Larger randomized controlled studies are recommended to further validate these findings and support broader adoption of this simplified approach in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.