ArticleCureus2025
Disrupting the Algorithm: The Role of Medical Professionals in TikTok's Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Conversations.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSocial media platforms have become important spaces for sharing information and personal experiences related to mental health conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). TikTok, in particular, has rapidly gained popularity among users aged 13 to 24 years old, who increasingly seek mental health content. This study explores engagement patterns with PTSD-related TikTok videos, comparing audience interactions with content created by medical professionals and non-medical creators.
methodsA total of 200 English-language TikTok videos were analyzed. Creators were classified as medical professionals or non-medical professionals based on profile information, LinkedIn verification, and institutional affiliations. Engagement metrics, including views, likes, comments, and shares, were collected and analyzed using t-tests to assess differences between creator types.
resultsNon-medical creators produced the majority of content (n= 168; 84%), while medical professionals contributed 16% (n= 32). Cumulative engagement metrics, total views, comments, likes, and shares, did not differ significantly between groups. However, videos by non-medical creators received significantly more likes per day (p=0.04), reflecting faster initial engagement. In contrast, videos by medical professionals accumulated similar overall engagement over a longer period, suggesting steady and sustained interaction. Discussion: These findings challenge the assumption that medical professionals are at a disadvantage on platforms like TikTok. Despite non-medical creators generating more immediate engagement, medical professionals can reach comparable audiences over time, offering an opportunity to disseminate accurate, evidence-based information. The results emphasize the importance of medical professionals adopting platform-specific strategies to increase their visibility and credibility in digital spaces. This study advances understanding of PTSD discourse on social media and highlights the critical role digital platforms play in shaping public perceptions of mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.