Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267673›Full record

ArticleJournal of data science : JDS2024

Magnitude Pruning of Large Pretrained Transformer Models with a Mixture Gaussian Prior.

Mingxuan Zhang, Yan Sun, Faming Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of data science : JDS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingxuan ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Yan SunDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA.
Faming LiangDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

Funding

An Imputation-Consistency Algorithm for Biomedical Complex Data AnalysisR01GM126089 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LIANG, FAMING · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
Stochastic Deep Learning for Electronic Health Records: Localizing Learning with Massive and Fragmented DataR01GM152717 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LIANG, FAMING, WANG, XIAOFENG · 2023 to 2025
$600k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126089NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM152717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large pretrained transformer models have revolutionized modern AI applications with their state-of-the-art performance in natural language processing (NLP). However, their substantial parameter count poses challenges for real-world deployment. To address this, researchers often reduce model size by pruning parameters based on their magnitude or sensitivity. Previous research has demonstrated the limitations of magnitude pruning, especially in the context of transfer learning for modern NLP tasks. In this paper, we introduce a new magnitude-based pruning algorithm called mixture Gaussian prior pruning (MGPP), which employs a mixture Gaussian prior for regularization. MGPP prunes non-expressive weights under the guidance of the mixture Gaussian prior, aiming to retain the model's expressive capability. Extensive evaluations across various NLP tasks, including natural language understanding, question answering, and natural language generation, demonstrate the superiority of MGPP over existing pruning methods, particularly in high sparsity settings. Additionally, we provide a theoretical justification for the consistency of the sparse transformer, shedding light on the effectiveness of the proposed pruning method.

Indexed as

consistencylarge language modelsparsitystochastic transformertransformer

Identifiers

PMID41267673
PMCPMC12629628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.