Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026
Motivational smoking cessation counselling and community-based follow-up after hospitalisation for vascular disease: A randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness of in-hospital motivational smoking cessation counselling and proactive referral to community-based follow-up.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Trial
- Motivational smoking cessation counselling and community-based follow-up after hospitalisation for vascular disease: A randomised controlled trial.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Trial
- Clinical and psychosocial factors predicting persistent smoking in hospitalized patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease: A prespecified analysis of two randomized controlled trials.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsEvidence for motivational interviewing for smoking cessation is weak, with limited data on long-term abstinence rates. This trial aimed to evaluate the effect of in-hospital motivational interviewing-based smoking cessation counselling combined with proactive referral to community-based follow-up on 6- and 12-month continuous smoking abstinence in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease.
designMulticentre, randomised, open-label, blinded-end-point trial with 1:1 randomisation.
settingThree secondary care hospitals in Norway, with recruitment from November 2021 to October 2023.
participantsHospitalised patients with established atherosclerotic vascular disease who smoked ≥1 cigarette daily prior to unplanned or elective hospitalisation. A total of 221 were randomised (40% women, mean age 65.2 years), of whom 213 were included in the primary analysis due to 7 deaths and 1 withdrawal. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: In the intervention group (n = 109), a trained nurse conducted a single 30-minute motivational interviewing-based counselling session, provided a leaflet explaining the local community-based cessation programme, sent discharge information to the general practitioner and arranged for a personal telephone invitation from the centre staff to the follow-up programme. In the control group (n = 111), a physician gave brief cessation advice and the nurse provided a leaflet about the cessation programme and sent discharge information to the general practitioner. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was self-reported continuous smoking abstinence at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included biochemically validated abstinence (measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide) at 6 months and self-reported abstinence at 12 months. Exploratory outcomes included recurrent vascular events over a median 18-month follow-up.
findingsSmoking abstinence at 6 months was 49.5% (53/107) and 24.5% (26/106) in the intervention and control groups, respectively [odds ratio (OR) = 3.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.70-5.55, P < 0.001]. The number needed to treat to achieve one additional abstinence was 4 (95% CI = 3-9). Biochemically validated abstinence was 44.9% (48/107) and 20.8% (22/106) in the intervention and control groups, respectively (OR = 3.28, 95% CI = 1.76-6.12). At 12 months, smoking abstinence was 45.7% (48/105) and 27.5% (28/102) in the intervention and control groups, respectively (OR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.27-4.20). After a median of 18-month follow-up, a prespecified vascular event occurred in 24.8% (27/109) and 34.2% (38/111) of intervention and control participants, respectively.
conclusionsIn-hospital motivational counselling combined with proactive referral to follow-up in a community-based cessation programme approximately doubled long-term smoking abstinence rates in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease and reduced occurrence of a new vascular event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.