ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2025
Sensory Enrichment and Deprivation During Development: Limited Effects on the Volumes of CNS Neuropils in Two Spiders With Different Ecology.
Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensory Enrichment and Deprivation During Development: Limited Effects on the Volumes of CNS Neuropils in Two Spiders With Different Ecology.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroplasticity is a core property of animal nervous systems, enabling structural changes in the brain in response to environmental stimuli or internal processes such as learning. Among spiders-a diverse group of predators-neuroanatomy varies with hunting strategy: stationary species that build capture webs differ from cursorial species that hunt without webs, reflecting reliance on distinct sensory modalities. While neuroplasticity has been documented in cursorial jumping spiders, its direct drivers remain unclear. In this study, we tested how sensory input influences the central nervous system (CNS) and whether stationary and cursorial hunters differ in their plastic responses. Using sensory deprivation and enrichment, we reared spiders under four treatments: control (CON), vibratory enrichment (VIB), visual enrichment (VIS), and combined enrichment (VISVIB). We examined the stationary hunter Parasteatoda tepidariorum and the cursorial hunter Marpissa muscosa. We predicted that enrichment would enlarge neuropil volumes in modality-specific brain regions, with stronger vibratory effects in P. tepidariorum and stronger visual effects in M. muscosa. Contrary to our expectations, sensory enrichment did not increase the volume of the corresponding CNS neuropils in either species. Although certain neuropils showed significant differences in specific groups, no clear causal link to sensory input emerged. Instead, a substantial proportion of the variation in neuropil volume was explained by family effects (shared maternal origin). We discuss these findings in the context of potential mechanisms underlying environmental plasticity in the spider brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.