Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267461›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Self-efficacy, Self-regulation, and Barriers to Dietitian-led Nutrition Counseling: Qualitative Interviews with Adults with Diabetes in the United Arab Emirates.

Habiba I Ali, Amal I Al Harbi, Maitha Alnahdi, Mahra S Alshamsi, Mariam R Aldhaheri, Shamma M Al Meqbaali, Meera A Aldahmani, Bolaji Ilesanmi-Oyelere, Ayesha S Al Dhaheri, Leila Cheikh Ismail and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Habiba I AliDepartment of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-2685-1244
Amal I Al HarbiImperial College London Diabetes Centre, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Maitha AlnahdiDepartment of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.
Mahra S AlshamsiDepartment of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.
Mariam R AldhaheriDepartment of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.
Shamma M Al MeqbaaliDepartment of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.
Meera A AldahmaniDepartment of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.
Bolaji Ilesanmi-OyelereOptimal Clinical Trials, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ayesha S Al DhaheriDepartment of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.
Leila Cheikh IsmailDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Lily StojanovskaInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nishan Sudheera KalupahanaDepartment of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the critical role of dietitians in supporting diabetes management through nutrition education, attendance at dietetics consultations remains suboptimal. Although the Arab Gulf Region has one of the highest prevalence rates of diabetes globally, there is a lack of research investigating the barriers and facilitators influencing both diabetes management and participation in dietetics consultations in this region. This study explored patients' perspectives on diabetes nutrition management within the framework of self-regulation and self-efficacy constructs of the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and their suggestions for improving patient attendance in dietitian-led nutrition counseling sessions.

methodsAudio recordings of semi-structured interviews with 44 adults attending a diabetes clinic in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) were transcribed in Arabic, translated into English, and thematically analyzed to examine the participants' self-management strategies, self-efficacy beliefs, and suggestions for improving attendance at dietitian-led nutrition counseling sessions.

resultsFive themes emerged: barriers to diabetes self-management, diabetes self-management practices, high self-efficacy, low self-efficacy, and suggestions for improving attendance at dietitian nutrition counseling. Barriers included time constraints, scheduling issues, socio-cultural factors, health status, and nutrition counseling quality. Confidence levels varied, with some patients requiring reminders or additional information. Suggested improvements included coordinated appointments, reminders, remote sessions, and enhancing the quality of nutrition counseling.

conclusionAddressing personal, social, and visit scheduling barriers may improve attendance and support effective diabetes management.

Indexed as

CounselingDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2NutritionistsSelf-ControlSelf EfficacyAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSelf-ManagementUnited Arab Emiratesbarriersdiabetesdietitian-led nutrition counseling visitsenablersqualitative interviewsself-efficacyself-regulationsocial cognitive theoryUnited Arab Emirates

Identifiers

PMID41267461
PMCPMC12639237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.