ArticleThe plant genome2025
Exploring the efficacy of phenomic and genomic selection for yield and fruit quality traits in strawberry.
Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the efficacy of phenomic and genomic selection for yield and fruit quality traits in strawberry.The plant genome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phenomic selection is a breeding approach that incorporates phenomic data into statistical models to predict new genotypes. There is still much to learn about the efficacy of phenomic selection compared to genomic selection and best practices for its application in different crops. We utilized multispectral imaging of 1122 strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne) clones across four consecutive seasons to compare genomic selection and phenomic selection within and across seasons. Phenomic selection within seasons was more predictive than genomic selection for fruit yield but was less predictive than genomic selection for fruit quality traits. Phenomic models incorporating vegetation indices (VI) were 16% more effective than models with independent spectral bands. Models combining both phenomic and genomic data were most effective for across-season prediction of yield-related traits, with average predictive abilities of 56% for fruit size and 57% for yield. Models with single timepoints were 91% as predictive as models with weekly data across the season, but this was largely influenced by the specific timepoint of data capture. Lastly, we show that the predictive ability of phenomic selection increased significantly with the number of clonal replicates in the training set. Overall, these results suggest that phenomic selection is highly effective in strawberry breeding but is dependent on the trait, timepoint of data capture, and level of clonal replication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.