ArticleBMC rheumatology2025
Improving osteoarthritis diagnosis and management in the primary care setting: a concise educational tool for primary care providers.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis, and its prevalence is increasing. We developed an educational tool to improve primary care provider (PCP) comfort with diagnosis and management of non-inflammatory arthritis.
methodsA pilot survey of PCP comfort with OA informed the creation of a two-page educational tool which was introduced at 28 clinics within the University of Vermont Health Network. The tool's utility was assessed with pre- (n = 94) and post-intervention (n = 32) surveys. We conducted a chart review of adult patients diagnosed with OA at new patient rheumatology visits between 2020 and 2022.
resultsOA was the principal diagnosis at 9% of new patient rheumatology visits. Among 390 patients diagnosed with OA, 22 (5%) returned to rheumatology clinic within 6 months. Patients traveled on average 31 miles (SD ± 30) and 40 min (SD ± 31) one-way to reach new patient appointments. Pre-intervention, clinicians were least comfortable knowing when to refer to rheumatology and most comfortable diagnosing OA. Post-intervention, there were improvements in total comfort with OA management and when to refer to orthopedics. Half of clinicians (50%) used the tool in practice, 63% in medical education and 43% in shared decision making. Post-intervention, 34% expected a reduction in rheumatology referrals and 9% reported placing fewer referrals already.
conclusionsA small percentage of patients with OA require ongoing rheumatologic care, with patients traveling a significant distance for evaluation. The introduction of a concise educational tool for PCPs improved comfort managing non-inflammatory arthritis with anticipation of fewer referrals to rheumatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.