ArticleReproductive health2025
Reproductive autonomy of women living with multiple myeloma participating in a pregnancy prevention program.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple myeloma is an incurable hematologic cancer that primarily affects older adults. Females of childbearing potential represent a small but uniquely affected proportion of the multiple myeloma population. The immunomodulatory agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide) are highly effective treatments in improving prolonged periods of deep remission and long-term survival in Multiple Myeloma, is dispensed through controlled distribution programs that require pregnancy monitoring for females of childbearing potential to reduce the risk of fetal exposure. There is limited understanding of the impact of pregnancy prevention and monitoring measures on the reproductive health, autonomy, and rights of women living with multiple myeloma.
methodsThis critical qualitative study is informed by a descriptive methodological approach, and a feminist reproductive justice theoretical framework informed the data analysis and interpretation. We employed purposive sampling to identify and conduct interviews with females of childbearing potential, living with multiple myeloma, that have experience participating in a controlled distribution program.
resultsThis study reflects the experiences of 15 females of childbearing potential living with MM, all of whom identified as women and ranged in age from 33–50 at diagnosis. Participants were situated in provinces across Canada, with most identifying as White, married, and of higher socioeconomic status. Findings illuminate a multitude of ways in which controlled distribution programs imposed threats to the reproductive health and autonomy of these women. Although many participants acknowledged the importance of preventing fetal exposure to teratogenic medications, the prescriptive and controlling nature of hyper-vigilant pregnancy monitoring programs and practices imposed significant burden and constraints on females of childbearing potential. Key analytic themes highlight the perceived paternalistic nature of controlled distribution programs, the systemic distrust of females of childbearing potential, and women’s actions and advocacy efforts to (re)claim their reproductive agency.
conclusionParticipant-informed adaptations to the design and delivery of pregnancy monitoring and prevention requirements in existing controlled distribution programs to promote the reproductive autonomy and agency of females of childbearing potential are both necessary and feasible. Key recommendations include increased provision of timely, comprehensive information and education, psychosocial support, as well as modifications to programs and regulatory bodies to recognize women as trustworthy and capable of autonomous, reproductive health decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.