Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267085›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2025

Goal consensus and task agreement as predictors of attendance and compliance in community-based treatments for adolescents with emotional disorders.

Adam Panek, Emilie J Butler, Amanda Jensen-Doss, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Golda S Ginsburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam PanekDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 65 Kane Street Room 3022, West Hartford, CT, 06119, USA.
Emilie J ButlerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 65 Kane Street Room 3022, West Hartford, CT, 06119, USA.
Amanda Jensen-DossDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248185, Coral Gables, FL, 33124-0751, USA.
Jill Ehrenreich-MayDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248185, Coral Gables, FL, 33124-0751, USA.
Golda S GinsburgDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 65 Kane Street Room 3022, West Hartford, CT, 06119, USA. gginsburg@uchc.edu.

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS MH106657, MH106536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral psychosocial treatments for adolescents with anxiety and depressive disorders have been shown to be effective. However, when evaluated in community clinics, response rates are poor, in part due to higher attrition and low treatment compliance. The working alliance between clinician and client is one important predictor of therapy attendance and compliance. Working alliance is comprised of three different components (i.e., goal consensus, task agreement, and bond). However, there is little research examining the unique contributions of two key components, goal consensus and task agreement. Exploring these components individually may shed light on important clinician-client interactions during therapy that might reduce attrition and improve compliance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether clinician and adolescent perceptions of agreement on (1) therapy goals (referred to as goal consensus) and (2) the tasks or actions needed to reach the goals (referred to as task agreement) predict therapy attendance and compliance in the context of a community-based randomized controlled trial of treatments for adolescents with emotional disorders.

methodsParticipants include 89 clinicians (87.7% White) and 166 adolescents (mean age 14.7; 62.0% White) with a primary anxiety or depressive disorder enrolled in the Community Study of Outcome Monitoring for Emotional Disorders in Teens (COMET) study. Data on goal consensus and task agreement were collected digitally eight weeks after the initiation of treatment using the Working Alliance Inventory, reported by clinician and adolescent. Treatment compliance was rated by the clinician after each weekly session (1 = poor compliance to 7 = good compliance), and therapy attendance was measured by the total number of therapy sessions attended over 16 weeks.

resultsResults of linear regression models, controlling for baseline anxiety/depression severity, treatment condition, and adolescent demographic characteristics, revealed that higher goal consensus (reported by both adolescent and clinician) significantly predicted higher attendance and compliance. Similarly, adolescent and clinician reports of higher task agreement predicted higher session attendance and treatment compliance.

conclusionThe current findings suggest that the more that adolescents and clinicians agreed on setting goals and the therapeutic tasks to achieve those goals, the more frequently adolescents attended therapy and complied with therapy expectations. Creating structured approaches to confirming goals and agreement on therapy tasks throughout treatment may be important and promote better treatment attendance and compliance and ultimately better outcomes for adolescents with emotional disorders.

Indexed as

AttendanceCommunity mental healthComplianceEmotional disordersGoal consensusTask agreement

Identifiers

PMID41267085
PMCPMC12632071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.