Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267071›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for equity in health2025

The role of nutrition-sensitive interventions in improving nutritional outcomes: findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thomas de Hoop, Adria Molotsky, Rebecca Walcott, Pablo Gaitán-Rossi, Sonia Hernández-Cordero, Amos Laar, Torben Behmer, Hoa Thi Mai Nguyen, Averi Chakrabarti, Garima Siwach and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Thomas de HoopAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington D.C, USA. tdehoop@air.org.
Adria MolotskyAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington D.C, USA.
Rebecca WalcottAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington D.C, USA.
Pablo Gaitán-RossiUniversidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sonia Hernández-CorderoUniversidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Amos LaarUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Torben BehmerAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington D.C, USA.
Hoa Thi Mai NguyenWorld Bank, Washington D.C, USA.
Averi ChakrabartiAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington D.C, USA.
Garima SiwachAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington D.C, USA.
Varsha RanjitAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington D.C, USA.
Vania Lara-MejíaUniversidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Bianca Franco-LaresUniversidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Mireya VilarWorld Bank, Washington D.C, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and child undernutrition remains a major global health concern despite modest progress. Accelerating reductions in stunting and wasting will require increased investments in nutrition-sensitive interventions, which target nutrition impacts outside of the healthcare setting. This review examines the effects of four types of nutrition-sensitive interventions -cash/food transfers, nutrition-sensitive agriculture, water/sanitation/hygiene, and school nutrition- on maternal and child nutrition outcomes and dietary diversity.

methodsWe synthesized the evidence using an initial broad search and synthesis for nutrition-sensitive interventions, followed by targeted searches and syntheses for specific interventions and nutrition outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the impacts of cash transfers and agricultural interventions, while a narrative synthesis was produced for additional nutrition-sensitive interventions. Additionally, qualitative synthesis was incorporated to provide insights into the relationship between implementation context and program effectiveness.

resultsOur initial evidence synthesis included 260 quantitative studies, and additional targeted searches produced 72 eligible articles. Meta-analyses reveal positive impacts on dietary diversity for cash transfers without nutrition-specific components (0.14 SMD; 95% CI: 0.06-0.22), and some nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions (0.24 SMD; 95% CI: 0.11-0.37). Cash transfers have larger effects on dietary diversity when they include behavior change communication or other nutrition-specific elements (0.41 SMD; 95% CI; 0.15-0.66), whereas agriculture programs with nutrition-specific elements do not show larger effects on dietary diversity than those without. Narrative syntheses indicate that homestead food production interventions may reduce anemia, school feeding interventions may improve anthropometric outcomes, and WASH interventions are most effective when combined with other nutrition initiatives.

conclusionsWe find consistent evidence that nutrition-sensitive programs contribute to dietary diversity and may have small but positive effects on nutrition outcomes, such as anthropometric outcomes and anemia. Integrating nutrition into social protection, agriculture, and education sectors is essential for addressing the underlying causes of malnutrition, such as dietary diversity. REGISTRATION: Our review protocols were pre-registered at AIR.org [ https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/2024-01/Synthesis-of-evidence-nutrition-sensitive-interventions-maternal-childrens-nutrition-outcomes-research-protocol-Nov-2023.pdf ] and PROSPERO [ https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024552449 ].

Indexed as

MalnutritionNutritional StatusAgricultureChildFemaleHumansAnemiaDietary diversityMaternal and child nutrition outcomesNutritionNutrition-sensitive interventionsStunting

Identifiers

PMID41267071
PMCPMC12636154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.